↓ Skip to main content

Suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by interleukin-10 transduced neural stem/progenitor cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by interleukin-10 transduced neural stem/progenitor cells
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-10-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliane Klose, Nils Ole Schmidt, Arthur Melms, Makoto Dohi, Jun-ichi Miyazaki, Felix Bischof, Bernhard Greve

Abstract

Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) have the ability to migrate into the central nervous system (CNS) to replace damaged cells. In inflammatory CNS disease, cytokine transduced neural stem cells may be used as vehicles to specifically reduce inflammation and promote cell replacement. In this study, we used NSPCs overexpressing IL-10, an immunomodulatory cytokine, in an animal model for CNS inflammation and multiple sclerosis (MS). Intravenous injection of IL-10 transduced neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPC(IL-10)) suppressed myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein aa 35-55 (MOG35-55)- induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and, following intravenous injection, NSPC(IL-10) migrated to peripheral lymphoid organs and into the CNS. NSPC(IL-10 )suppressed antigen-specific proliferation and proinflammatory cytokine production of lymph node cells obtained from MOG35-55 peptide immunized mice. In this model, IL-10 producing NSPCs act via a peripheral immunosuppressive effect to attenuate EAE.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,288
of 2,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,132
of 204,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.