You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adherence to management guidelines for growth faltering and anaemia in remote dwelling Australian Aboriginal infants and barriers to health service delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah J Bar-Zeev, Sue G Kruske, Lesley M Barclay, Naor Bar-Zeev, Sue V Kildea |
| Abstract |
Remote dwelling Aboriginal infants from northern Australia have a high burden of disease and frequently use health services. Little is known about the quality of infant care provided by remote health services. This study describes the adherence to infant guidelines for anaemia and growth faltering by remote health staff and barriers to effective service delivery in remote settings. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,690,857
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,152
of 7,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,852
of 194,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#17
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.