↓ Skip to main content

Understanding determinants of nutrition, physical activity and quality of life among older adults: the Wellbeing, Eating and Exercise for a Long Life (WELL) study

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding determinants of nutrition, physical activity and quality of life among older adults: the Wellbeing, Eating and Exercise for a Long Life (WELL) study
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-10-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah A McNaughton, David Crawford, Kylie Ball, Jo Salmon

Abstract

Nutrition and physical activity are major determinants of health and quality of life; however, there exists little research focusing on determinants of these behaviours in older adults. This is important, since just as these behaviours vary according to subpopulation, it is likely that the determinants also vary. An understanding of the modifiable determinants of nutrition and physical activity behaviours among older adults to take into account the specific life-stage context is required in order to develop effective interventions to promote health and well-being and prevent chronic disease and improve quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 363 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 21%
Student > Bachelor 68 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Researcher 25 7%
Other 64 17%
Unknown 69 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 13%
Social Sciences 45 12%
Sports and Recreations 28 8%
Psychology 26 7%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 80 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,264,174
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#841
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,949
of 187,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.