↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol: evaluation of a parenting and stress management programme: a randomised controlled trial of Triple P Discussion Groups and Stress Control

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study protocol: evaluation of a parenting and stress management programme: a randomised controlled trial of Triple P Discussion Groups and Stress Control
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie L Palmer, Marion Henderson, Matthew R Sanders, Louise J Keown, Jim White

Abstract

Children displaying psychosocial problems are at an increased risk of negative developmental outcomes. Parenting practices are closely linked with child development and behaviour, and parenting programmes have been recommended in the treatment of child psychosocial problems. However, parental mental health also needs to be addressed when delivering parenting programmes as it is linked with parenting practices, child outcomes, and treatment outcomes of parenting programmes. This paper describes the protocol of a study examining the effects of a combined intervention of a parenting programme and a cognitive behavioural intervention for mental health problems.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 31 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#11,956,630
of 21,347,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,216
of 13,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,589
of 186,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.