You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A survey of cancer patients’ unmet information and coordination needs in handovers – a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-6-378 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva Gad Søndergaard, Bettina Haastrup Grøne, Christian Nielsen Wulff, Pia Veldt Larsen, Jens Søndergaard |
| Abstract |
The care responsibilities for cancer patients are frequently handed over from one healthcare professional to another. These handovers are known to pose a threat to the safety of patients and the efficiency of the healthcare system. Little is known about specific needs of cancer patients in handovers. The objectives of this study were to examine cancer patients' unmet needs for information and coordination in handovers and to analyse the association between patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and unmet information and coordination needs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 25% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2013.
All research outputs
#17,697,777
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,823
of 4,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,178
of 203,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#45
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.