↓ Skip to main content

Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-21-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celina Blum-Fowler, Cynthia Peterson, Johanna Forrer McChurch, Yann Le Clech, B Kim Humphreys

Abstract

Finding the best outcome measures for research and quality assurance purposes in terms of validity, sensitivity to change, length and ease of completion is crucial. The Bournemouth questionnaire for neck pain patients was recently translated and validated into German and found to be more sensitive to change than other commonly used questionnaires. However, the low back pain version is not yet available in German. Therefore the purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) for low back pain (LBP) into German.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 7 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,124,958
of 4,507,280 outputs
Outputs from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
#152
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,077
of 98,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.