↓ Skip to main content

Oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and PE randomized studies

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 213)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
380 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and PE randomized studies
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-9560-11-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin H Prins, Anthonie WA Lensing, Rupert Bauersachs, Bonno van Bellen, Henri Bounameaux, Timothy A Brighton, Alexander T Cohen, Bruce L Davidson, Hervé Decousus, Gary E Raskob, Scott D Berkowitz, Philip S Wells

Abstract

Standard treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) consists of a heparin combined with vitamin K antagonists. Direct oral anticoagulants have been investigated for acute and extended treatment of symptomatic VTE; their use could avoid parenteral treatment and/or laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 257 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 52 19%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Other 62 23%
Unknown 28 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 172 63%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 46 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,208,543
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#7
of 213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,269
of 175,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them