↓ Skip to main content

High-flow nasal cannula support therapy: new insights and improving performance

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
95 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-flow nasal cannula support therapy: new insights and improving performance
Published in
Critical Care, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1640-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gonzalo Hernández, Oriol Roca, Laura Colinas

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2017. Other selected articles can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2017 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 25 12%
Researcher 24 12%
Other 23 11%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Other 58 29%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 47 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#685,802
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#474
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,231
of 322,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.