↓ Skip to main content

Essential literature for the chiropractic profession: a survey of chiropractic research leaders

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Essential literature for the chiropractic profession: a survey of chiropractic research leaders
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-21-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara A Mansholt, John S Stites, Dustin C Derby, Ron J Boesch, Stacie A Salsbury

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical practice (EBCP) is an accepted practice for informed clinical decision making in mainstream health care professions. EBCP augments clinical experience and can have far reaching effects in education, policy, reimbursement and clinical management. The proliferation of published research can be overwhelming-finding a mechanism to identify literature that is essential for practitioners and students is desirable. The purpose of this study was to survey leaders in the chiropractic profession on their opinions of essential literature for doctors of chiropractic, faculty, and students to read or reference.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 11%
Lecturer 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 11 31%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 23%