↓ Skip to main content

Impact of heart failure on the behavior of human neonatal stem cells in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of heart failure on the behavior of human neonatal stem cells in vitro
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-11-236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Klose, Rajika Roy, Andreja Brodarac, Andreas Kurtz, Andrea Ode, Kyung-Sun Kang, Karen Bieback, Yeong-Hoon Choi, Christof Stamm

Abstract

Clinical cardiac cell therapy using autologous somatic stem cells is restricted by age and disease-associated impairment of stem cell function. Juvenile cells possibly represent a more potent alternative, but the impact of patient-related variables on such cell products is unknown. We therefore evaluated the behavior of neonatal cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (CB-MSC) in the presence of serum from patients with advanced heart failure (HF).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Decision Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,088,695
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#653
of 3,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,398
of 204,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#7
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.