You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The perspectives of iranian physicians and patients towards patient decision aids: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-6-379 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hamideh Rashidian, Saharnaz Nedjat, Reza Majdzadeh, Jaleh Gholami, Leila Haghjou, Bahar Sadeghi Abdollahi, Fereydoun Davatchi, Arash Rashidian |
Abstract |
Patient preference is one of the main components of clinical decision making, therefore leading to the development of patient decision aids. The goal of this study was to describe physicians' and patients' viewpoints on the barriers and limitations of using patient decision aids in Iran, their proposed solutions, and, the benefits of using these tools. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 23% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,929,940
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,100
of 4,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,777
of 203,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#13
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.