You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of RNA- or LNA-hybrid oligonucleotides in template-switching reactions for high-speed sequencing library preparation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-665 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthias Harbers, Sachi Kato, Michiel de Hoon, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Piero Carninci, Charles Plessy |
Abstract |
Analyzing the RNA pool or transcription start sites requires effective means to convert RNA into cDNA libraries for digital expression counting. With current high-speed sequencers, it is necessary to flank the cDNAs with specific adapters. Adding template-switching oligonucleotides to reverse transcription reactions is the most commonly used approach when working with very small quantities of RNA even from single cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 111 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 36 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 21% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 32% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,854,565
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,046
of 10,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,159
of 205,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#12
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,626 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.