You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Proteomic risk markers for coronary heart disease and stroke: validation and mediation of randomized trial hormone therapy effects on these diseases
Genome Medicine, January 2013
Ross L Prentice, Shanshan Zhao, Melissa Johnson, Aaron Aragaki, Judith Hsia, Rebecca D Jackson, Jacques E Rossouw, JoAnn E Manson, Samir M Hanash
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||5||10%|
|Student > Master||5||10%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||18||37%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||5||10%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||6%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||2%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
of 1,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 281,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.