You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Interrater and intrarater reliability of photoplethysmography for measuring toe blood pressure and toe‐brachial index in people with diabetes mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-1146-5-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher Scanlon, Kris Park, David Mapletoft, Lindy Begg, Joshua Burns |
Abstract |
A reliable tool to measure arterial flow to the feet in people with diabetes is required given that they are particularly prone to peripheral arterial disease. Traditionally, the ankle brachial index (ABI) has been used to measure arterial circulation, but its application is limited due to calcification of larger arteries. More recently, toe pressure and the toe brachial index (TBI) has been suggested as superior to ABI measurements because they assess smaller digital arteries less prone to arterial calcification. However, reliability studies for the clinical use of photoplethysmography (PPG) in people with diabetes are lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 16% |
Engineering | 5 | 12% |
Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |