↓ Skip to main content

A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-tip tree

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
434 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-tip tree
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-13-214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiina Särkinen, Lynn Bohs, Richard G Olmstead, Sandra Knapp

Abstract

The Solanaceae is a plant family of great economic importance. Despite a wealth of phylogenetic work on individual clades and a deep knowledge of particular cultivated species such as tomato and potato, a robust evolutionary framework with a dated molecular phylogeny for the family is still lacking. Here we investigate molecular divergence times for Solanaceae using a densely-sampled species-level phylogeny. We also review the fossil record of the family to derive robust calibration points, and estimate a chronogram using an uncorrelated relaxed molecular clock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 333 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 21%
Researcher 60 17%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 53 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 197 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 14%
Chemistry 10 3%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 67 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,520,354
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#642
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,329
of 218,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#19
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.