↓ Skip to main content

Basal cell adenocarcinoma of a hard palate minor salivary gland: case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Neck Oncology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basal cell adenocarcinoma of a hard palate minor salivary gland: case report and review of the literature
Published in
Head & Neck Oncology, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1758-3284-1-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryan K Ward, Raja R Seethala, E Leon Barnes, Stephen Y Lai

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Other 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Unknown 10 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#9,520,863
of 12,390,159 outputs
Outputs from Head & Neck Oncology
#16
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,045
of 261,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Neck Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,390,159 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them