↓ Skip to main content

Is manipulative therapy more effective than sham manipulation in adults?: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is manipulative therapy more effective than sham manipulation in adults?: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-21-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gwendolijne GM Scholten-Peeters, Erik Thoomes, Sophie Konings, Michelle Beijer, Karin Verkerk, Bart W Koes, Arianne P Verhagen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 22%
Other 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 20%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 39 28%