↓ Skip to main content

Field evaluation in Chad of community usage of CD4 T lymphocyte counting by alternative single-platform flow cytometry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field evaluation in Chad of community usage of CD4 T lymphocyte counting by alternative single-platform flow cytometry
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-373
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donato Koyalta, Mohammad-Ali Jenabian, Barou Djouater, Noël Djemadji-Oudjeil, Francois-Xavier Mbopi-Keou, Angélique Ndjoyi-Mbiguino, Laurent Bélec

Abstract

Field and community evaluation of the routine usage of CD4 T counting platforms is essential in resource-poor countries for efficient and cost-effective monitoring of HIV-infected adults and children attending health care centers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,029,040
of 4,508,238 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,620
of 2,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,568
of 99,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#95
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,508,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.