↓ Skip to main content

Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on management and clinical decision-making in heart failure patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on management and clinical decision-making in heart failure patients
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siddique A Abbasi, Andrew Ertel, Ravi V Shah, Vineet Dandekar, Jaehoon Chung, Geetha Bhat, Ankit A Desai, Raymond Y Kwong, Afshin Farzaneh-Far

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with heart failure. However, in the current health care environment, use of a new imaging modality like CMR requires evidence for direct additive impact on clinical management. We sought to evaluate the impact of CMR on clinical management and diagnosis in patients with heart failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Other 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,763,871
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#58
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,798
of 220,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.