↓ Skip to main content

Mindfulness based stress reduction study design of a longitudinal randomized controlled complementary intervention in women with breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mindfulness based stress reduction study design of a longitudinal randomized controlled complementary intervention in women with breast cancer
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth Kenne Sarenmalm, Lena B Mårtensson, Stig B Holmberg, Bengt A Andersson, Anders Odén, Ingrid Bergh

Abstract

The stress of a breast cancer diagnosis and its treatment can produce a variety of psychosocial sequelae including impaired immune responses. Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is a structured complementary program that incorporates meditation, yoga and mind-body exercises. Despite promising empirical evidence for the efficacy of MBSR, there is a need for randomized controlled trials (RCT). There is also a need for RCTs investigating the efficacy of psychosocial interventions on mood disorder and immune response in women with breast cancer. Therefore, the overall aim is to determine the efficacy of a Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) intervention on well-being and immune response in women with breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 291 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 16%
Student > Master 44 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 13%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 73 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,159,771
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,441
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,118
of 207,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#44
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.