↓ Skip to main content

A case study of the counterpart technical support policy to improve rural health services in Beijing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case study of the counterpart technical support policy to improve rural health services in Beijing
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-482
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weiyan Jian, Kit Yee Chan, Shunv Tang, Daniel D Reidpath

Abstract

There is, globally, an often observed inequality in the health services available in urban and rural areas. One strategy to overcome the inequality is to require urban doctors to spend time in rural hospitals. This approach was adopted by the Beijing Municipality (population of 20.19 million) to improve rural health services, but the approach has never been systematically evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Librarian 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,910,451
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,901
of 8,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,596
of 293,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#59
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.