You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A case study of the counterpart technical support policy to improve rural health services in Beijing
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-482 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Weiyan Jian, Kit Yee Chan, Shunv Tang, Daniel D Reidpath |
Abstract |
There is, globally, an often observed inequality in the health services available in urban and rural areas. One strategy to overcome the inequality is to require urban doctors to spend time in rural hospitals. This approach was adopted by the Beijing Municipality (population of 20.19 million) to improve rural health services, but the approach has never been systematically evaluated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 14% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Librarian | 4 | 6% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,910,451
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,901
of 8,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,596
of 293,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#59
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.