You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social network diagnostics: a tool for monitoring group interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabina B Gesell, Shari L Barkin, Thomas W Valente |
| Abstract |
Many behavioral interventions designed to improve health outcomes are delivered in group settings. To date, however, group interventions have not been evaluated to determine if the groups generate interaction among members and how changes in group interaction may affect program outcomes at the individual or group level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 19% |
| Researcher | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 47 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 15% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,103,353
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#895
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,131
of 215,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#20
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.