↓ Skip to main content

HLA and non-HLA genes in Behçet’s disease: a multicentric study in the Spanish population

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HLA and non-HLA genes in Behçet’s disease: a multicentric study in the Spanish population
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/ar4328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Antonio Montes-Cano, Marta Conde-Jaldón, José Raul García-Lozano, Lourdes Ortiz-Fernández, Norberto Ortego-Centeno, María Jesús Castillo-Palma, Gerard Espinosa, Genaro Graña-Gil, Miguel Angel González-Gay, Ana Celia Barnosi-Marín, Roser Solans, Patricia Fanlo, Teresa Camps, Santos Castañeda, Juan Sánchez-Bursón, Antonio Núñez-Roldán, Javier Martín, María Francisca González-Escribano

Abstract

According to genome wide association (GWA) studies as well as candidate gene approaches, Behçet's disease (BD) is associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A and HLA-B gene regions. The HLA-B51 has been consistently associated with the disease, but the role of other HLA class I molecules remains controversial. Recently, variants in non-HLA genes have also been associated with BD. The aims of this study were to further investigate the influence of the HLA region in BD and to explore the relationship with non-HLA genes recently described to be associated in other populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 12 32%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Unspecified 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,203
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,421
of 220,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#44
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.