↓ Skip to main content

H3N2 canine influenza virus causes severe morbidity in dogs with induction of genes related to inflammation and apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
H3N2 canine influenza virus causes severe morbidity in dogs with induction of genes related to inflammation and apoptosis
Published in
Veterinary Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1297-9716-44-92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Young Myong Kang, Heui Man Kim, Keun Bon Ku, Eun Hye Park, Jung Yum, Sang Heui Seo

Abstract

Dogs are companion animals that live in close proximity with humans. Canine H3N2 influenza virus has been isolated from pet dogs that showed severe respiratory signs and other clinical symptoms such as fever, reduced body weight, and interstitial pneumonia. The canine H3N2 influenza virus can be highly transmissible among dogs via aerosols. When we analyzed global gene expression in the lungs of infected dogs, the genes associated with the immune response and cell death were greatly elevated. Taken together, our results suggest that canine H3N2 influenza virus can be easily transmitted among dogs, and that severe pneumonia in the infected dogs may be partially due to the elevated expression of genes related to inflammation and apoptosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 25%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,589,985
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#86
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,115
of 220,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.