↓ Skip to main content

“A draft Musa balbisiana genome sequence for molecular genetics in polyploid, inter- and intra-specific Musa hybrids”

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“A draft Musa balbisiana genome sequence for molecular genetics in polyploid, inter- and intra-specific Musa hybrids”
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark W Davey, Ranganath Gudimella, Jennifer Ann Harikrishna, Lee Wan Sin, Norzulaani Khalid, Johan Keulemans

Abstract

Modern banana cultivars are primarily interspecific triploid hybrids of two species, Musa acuminata and Musa balbisiana, which respectively contribute the A- and B-genomes. The M. balbisiana genome has been associated with improved vigour and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses and is thus a target for Musa breeding programs. However, while a reference M. acuminata genome has recently been released (Nature 488:213-217, 2012), little sequence data is available for the corresponding B-genome.To address these problems we carried out Next Generation gDNA sequencing of the wild diploid M. balbisiana variety 'Pisang Klutuk Wulung' (PKW). Our strategy was to align PKW gDNA reads against the published A-genome and to extract the mapped consensus sequences for subsequent rounds of evaluation and gene annotation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 208 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 49 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,479
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,211
of 220,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#55
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.