You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
afterParty: turning raw transcriptomes into permanent resources
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-14-301 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martin Jones, Mark Blaxter |
Abstract |
Next-generation DNA sequencing technologies have made it possible to generate transcriptome data for novel organisms quickly and cheaply, to the extent that the effort required to annotate and publish a new transcriptome is greater than the effort required to sequence it. Often, following publication, details of the annotation effort are only available in summary form, hindering subsequent exploitation of the data. To promote best-practice in annotation and to ensure that data remain accessible, we have written afterParty, a web application that allows users to assemble, annotate and publish novel transcriptomes using only a web browser. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
France | 2 | 7% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 16 | 55% |
Members of the public | 12 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Norway | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 68 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 38% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 62% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 13% |
Computer Science | 7 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,173,097
of 24,241,559 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#124
of 7,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,887
of 214,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#3
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,241,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.