↓ Skip to main content

Neutrophils from critically ill septic patients mediate profound loss of endothelial barrier integrity

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neutrophils from critically ill septic patients mediate profound loss of endothelial barrier integrity
Published in
Critical Care, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13049
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Sepsis is characterized by systemic immune activation and neutrophil-mediated endothelial barrier integrity compromise, contributing to end-organ dysfunction. Studies evaluating endothelial barrier dysfunction induced by neutrophils from septic patients are lacking, despite its clinical significance. We hypothesized that septic neutrophils would cause characteristic patterns of endothelial barrier dysfunction, distinct from experimental stimulation of normal neutrophils, and that treatment with the immunomodulatory drug β-glucan would attenuate this effect.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 12 16%
Other 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 13 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,124,949
of 4,507,280 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,549
of 2,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,118
of 100,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.