You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Introducing meta-services for biomedical information extraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian Leitner, Martin Krallinger, Carlos Rodriguez-Penagos, Jörg Hakenberg, Conrad Plake, Cheng-Ju Kuo, Chun-Nan Hsu, Richard Tzong-Han Tsai, Hsi-Chuan Hung, William W Lau, Calvin A Johnson, Rune Sætre, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Yan Hua Chen, Sun Kim, Soo-Yong Shin, Byoung-Tak Zhang, William A Baumgartner, Lawrence Hunter, Barry Haddow, Michael Matthews, Xinglong Wang, Patrick Ruch, Frédéric Ehrler, Arzucan Özgür, Güneş Erkan, Dragomir R Radev, Michael Krauthammer, ThaiBinh Luong, Robert Hoffmann, Chris Sander, Alfonso Valencia |
| Abstract |
We introduce the first meta-service for information extraction in molecular biology, the BioCreative MetaServer (BCMS; http://bcms.bioinfo.cnio.es/). This prototype platform is a joint effort of 13 research groups and provides automatically generated annotations for PubMed/Medline abstracts. Annotation types cover gene names, gene IDs, species, and protein-protein interactions. The annotations are distributed by the meta-server in both human and machine readable formats (HTML/XML). This service is intended to be used by biomedical researchers and database annotators, and in biomedical language processing. The platform allows direct comparison, unified access, and result aggregation of the annotations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 63 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 40% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,269
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,563
of 95,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#31
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.