You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Novel applications of motif-directed profiling to identify disease resistance genes in plants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-9-37 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jack H Vossen, Sara Dezhsetan, Danny Esselink, Marjon Arens, Maria J Sanz, Walter Verweij, Estelle Verzaux, C Gerard van der Linden |
Abstract |
Molecular profiling of gene families is a versatile tool to study diversity between individual genomes in sexual crosses and germplasm. Nucleotide binding site (NBS) profiling, in particular, targets conserved nucleotide binding site-encoding sequences of resistance gene analogs (RGAs), and is widely used to identify molecular markers for disease resistance (R) genes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 80% |
Russia | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Ethiopia | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 23% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 70% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#627
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,072
of 222,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.