↓ Skip to main content

Novel applications of motif-directed profiling to identify disease resistance genes in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel applications of motif-directed profiling to identify disease resistance genes in plants
Published in
Plant Methods, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-9-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack H Vossen, Sara Dezhsetan, Danny Esselink, Marjon Arens, Maria J Sanz, Walter Verweij, Estelle Verzaux, C Gerard van der Linden

Abstract

Molecular profiling of gene families is a versatile tool to study diversity between individual genomes in sexual crosses and germplasm. Nucleotide binding site (NBS) profiling, in particular, targets conserved nucleotide binding site-encoding sequences of resistance gene analogs (RGAs), and is widely used to identify molecular markers for disease resistance (R) genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#627
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,072
of 222,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.