↓ Skip to main content

NaviCell: a web-based environment for navigation, curation and maintenance of large molecular interaction maps

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,115)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NaviCell: a web-based environment for navigation, curation and maintenance of large molecular interaction maps
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-7-100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inna Kuperstein, David PA Cohen, Stuart Pook, Eric Viara, Laurence Calzone, Emmanuel Barillot, Andrei Zinovyev

Abstract

Molecular biology knowledge can be formalized and systematically represented in a computer-readable form as a comprehensive map of molecular interactions. There exist an increasing number of maps of molecular interactions containing detailed and step-wise description of various cell mechanisms. It is difficult to explore these large maps, to organize discussion of their content and to maintain them. Several efforts were recently made to combine these capabilities together in one environment, and NaviCell is one of them.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Portugal 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Bangladesh 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 66 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 31%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 40%
Computer Science 20 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#807,981
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#8
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,135
of 177,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.