↓ Skip to main content

Family planning counseling for women living with HIV: a systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness on contraceptive uptake and pregnancy incidence, 1990 to 2011

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family planning counseling for women living with HIV: a systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness on contraceptive uptake and pregnancy incidence, 1990 to 2011
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin R O’Reilly, Caitlin E Kennedy, Virginia A Fonner, Michael D Sweat

Abstract

Family planning is an important public health intervention with numerous potential health benefits for all women. One of those key benefits is the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, through the prevention of unintended pregnancies among women living with HIV.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 27%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 6 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 17%
Social Sciences 23 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 29 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2013.
All research outputs
#5,833,042
of 21,615,008 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,092
of 14,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,256
of 186,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,615,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.