You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1758-5996-5-58 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cátia Cristina Silva Sousa Vergara Palma, Marco Pavesi, Verônica Guedes Nogueira, Eliete Leão Silva Clemente, Maria de Fátima Bevilacqua Motta Pereira Vasconcellos, Luiz Carlos Pereira, Fernanda Faissol Pacheco, Tássia Gomide Braga, Ludmila de Faria Bello, Juliana Oliveira Soares, Stefanie Cathren Fenizola dos Santos, Vinícius Paes Leme Cavalcante Campos, Marília Brito Gomes |
| Abstract |
Diabetes mellitus (DM) and thyroid dysfunction (TD) are the two most common endocrine disorders in clinical practice. The unrecognized TD may adversely affect the metabolic control and add more risk to an already predisposing scenario for cardiovascular diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of TD in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 54% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,922,577
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#102
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,148
of 209,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.