↓ Skip to main content

Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years
Published in
Trials, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamie J Kirkham, Maarten Boers, Peter Tugwell, Mike Clarke, Paula R Williamson

Abstract

The development and application of standardised sets of outcomes to be measured and reported in clinical trials have the potential to increase the efficiency and value of research. One of the most notable of the current outcome sets began nearly 20 years ago: the World Health Organization and International League of Associations for Rheumatology core set of outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials, originating from the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) Initiative. This study assesses the use of this core outcome set by randomised trials in rheumatology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Psychology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 26 29%