You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An online database for plant image analysis software tools
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-9-38 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guillaume Lobet, Xavier Draye, Claire Périlleux |
Abstract |
Recent years have seen an increase in methods for plant phenotyping using image analyses. These methods require new software solutions for data extraction and treatment. These solutions are instrumental in supporting various research pipelines, ranging from the localisation of cellular compounds to the quantification of tree canopies. However, due to the variety of existing tools and the lack of central repository, it is challenging for researchers to identify the software that is best suited for their research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 37% |
Russia | 3 | 10% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 77% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Belgium | 3 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Argentina | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 2% |
Unknown | 329 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 82 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 21% |
Student > Master | 50 | 14% |
Professor | 20 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 5% |
Other | 67 | 19% |
Unknown | 41 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 194 | 55% |
Engineering | 26 | 7% |
Computer Science | 20 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 20 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 8% |
Unknown | 48 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,088,927
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#32
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,680
of 223,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.