↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary interactions between haemagglutinin and neuraminidase in avian influenza

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary interactions between haemagglutinin and neuraminidase in avian influenza
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-13-222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa J Ward, Samantha J Lycett, Dorita Avila, Jonathan P Bollback, Andrew J Leigh Brown

Abstract

Reassortment between the RNA segments encoding haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), the major antigenic influenza proteins, produces viruses with novel HA and NA subtype combinations and has preceded the emergence of pandemic strains. It has been suggested that productive viral infection requires a balance in the level of functional activity of HA and NA, arising from their closely interacting roles in the viral life cycle, and that this functional balance could be mediated by genetic changes in the HA and NA. Here, we investigate how the selective pressure varies for H7 avian influenza HA on different NA subtype backgrounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 33 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 44%
Chemistry 5 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,474,477
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,984
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,367
of 222,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#43
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.