↓ Skip to main content

Antiviral activity of carnosic acid against respiratory syncytial virus

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
10 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antiviral activity of carnosic acid against respiratory syncytial virus
Published in
Virology Journal, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-10-303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han-Bo Shin, Myung-Soo Choi, Byeol Ryu, Na-Rae Lee, Hye-In Kim, Hye-Eun Choi, Jun Chang, Kyung-Tae Lee, Dae Sik Jang, Kyung-Soo Inn

Abstract

Human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) is a leading cause of severe lower respiratory infection and a major public health threat worldwide. To date, no vaccine or effective therapeutic agent has been developed. In a screen for potential therapeutic agents against hRSV, we discovered that an extract of Rosmarinus officinalis exerted a strong inhibitory effect against hRSV infection. Subsequent studies identified carnosic acid as a bioactive constituent responsible for anti-hRSV activity. Carnosic acid has been shown to exhibit potent antioxidant and anti-cancer activities. Anti-RSV activity of carnosic acid was further investigated in this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lithuania 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,442,961
of 25,123,315 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#218
of 3,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,653
of 216,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#8
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,123,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.