↓ Skip to main content

Network topology of NaV1.7 mutations in sodium channel-related painful disorders

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Network topology of NaV1.7 mutations in sodium channel-related painful disorders
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12918-016-0382-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimos Kapetis, Jenny Sassone, Yang Yang, Barbara Galbardi, Markos N. Xenakis, Ronald L. Westra, Radek Szklarczyk, Patrick Lindsey, Catharina G. Faber, Monique Gerrits, Ingemar S. J. Merkies, Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj, Massimo Mantegazza, Stephen G. Waxman, Giuseppe Lauria, on behalf of the PROPANE Study Group

Abstract

Gain-of-function mutations in SCN9A gene that encodes the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7 have been associated with a wide spectrum of painful syndromes in humans including inherited erythromelalgia, paroxysmal extreme pain disorder and small fibre neuropathy. These mutations change the biophysical properties of NaV1.7 channels leading to hyperexcitability of dorsal root ganglion nociceptors and pain symptoms. There is a need for better understanding of how gain-of-function mutations alter the atomic structure of Nav1.7. We used homology modeling to build an atomic model of NaV1.7 and a network-based theoretical approach, which can predict interatomic interactions and connectivity arrangements, to investigate how pain-related NaV1.7 mutations may alter specific interatomic bonds and cause connectivity rearrangement, compared to benign variants and polymorphisms. For each amino acid substitution, we calculated the topological parameters betweenness centrality (B ct ), degree (D), clustering coefficient (CC ct ), closeness (C ct ), and eccentricity (E ct ), and calculated their variation (Δ value  = mutant value -WT value ). Pathogenic NaV1.7 mutations showed significantly higher variation of |ΔB ct | compared to benign variants and polymorphisms. Using the cut-off value ±0.26 calculated by receiver operating curve analysis, we found that ΔB ct correctly differentiated pathogenic NaV1.7 mutations from variants not causing biophysical abnormalities (nABN) and homologous SNPs (hSNPs) with 76% sensitivity and 83% specificity. Our in-silico analyses predict that pain-related pathogenic NaV1.7 mutations may affect the network topological properties of the protein and suggest |ΔB ct | value as a potential in-silico marker.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Professor 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Neuroscience 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Chemistry 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,411,380
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#1,011
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,610
of 311,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.