↓ Skip to main content

Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-9-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Johnston, Pascale Allotey, Kim Mulholland, Milica Markovic

Abstract

Human rights violations have adverse consequences for health. However, to date, there remains little empirical evidence documenting this association, beyond the obvious physical and psychological effects of torture. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether Australian asylum policies and practices, which arguably violate human rights, are associated with adverse health outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Other 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 24%
Psychology 15 18%
Social Sciences 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,130
of 17,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,910
of 185,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#25
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.