You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The value of usability testing for Internet-based adolescent self-management interventions: “Managing Hemophilia Online”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicky R Breakey, Ashley V Warias, Danial M Ignas, Meghan White, Victor S Blanchette, Jennifer N Stinson |
| Abstract |
As adolescents with hemophilia approach adulthood, they are expected to assume responsibility for their disease management. A bilingual (English and French) Internet-based self-management program, "Teens Taking Charge: Managing Hemophilia Online," was developed to support adolescents with hemophilia in this transition. This study explored the usability of the website and resulted in refinement of the prototype. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 24% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 16% |
| Psychology | 15 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#17,699,064
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,497
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,602
of 207,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#29
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.