↓ Skip to main content

Use of ‘tidal volume challenge’ to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of ‘tidal volume challenge’ to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation
Published in
Critical Care, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1637-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheila Nainan Myatra, Xavier Monnet, Jean-Louis Teboul

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2017. Other selected articles can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2017 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 18%
Student > Postgraduate 22 15%
Student > Master 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Neuroscience 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,341,415
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,154
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,351
of 322,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.