↓ Skip to main content

Use of ‘tidal volume challenge’ to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of ‘tidal volume challenge’ to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation
Published in
Critical Care, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1637-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheila Nainan Myatra, Xavier Monnet, Jean-Louis Teboul

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2017. Other selected articles can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2017 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 28 20%
Student > Postgraduate 21 15%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 69%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 33 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,010,168
of 20,551,883 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#896
of 5,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,330
of 280,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,551,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.