↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of drinking patterns and their impact on alcohol-related aggression: a national survey of adolescent behaviours

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of drinking patterns and their impact on alcohol-related aggression: a national survey of adolescent behaviours
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valeria Siciliano, Lorena Mezzasalma, Valentina Lorenzoni, Stefania Pieroni, Sabrina Molinaro

Abstract

Although there have been a wide range of epidemiological studies examining the impact of patterns of alcohol consumption among adolescents, there remains considerable variability in both defining these patterns and the ability to comprehensively evaluate their relationship to behavioural patterns. This study explores a new procedure for defining and evaluating drinking patterns and integrating well-established indicators. The composite measure is then used to estimate the impact of these patterns on alcohol-related aggressive behaviour among Italian adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,015,153
of 25,340,976 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,487
of 16,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,635
of 217,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#146
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,340,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.