You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of pregnancy intention on the use of antenatal care services: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-10-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yohannes Dibaba, Mesganaw Fantahun, Michelle J Hindin |
| Abstract |
There has been considerable debate in the reproductive health literature as to whether unintended pregnancy influences use of maternal health services, particularly antenatal care. Despite the wealth of studies examining the association between pregnancy intention and antenatal care, findings remain mixed and inconclusive. The objective of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyse studies on the association between pregnancy intention and antenatal care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 51 | 21% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,226
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,341
of 179,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.