You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-948 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristine Sørensen, Stephan Van den Broucke, Jürgen M Pelikan, James Fullam, Gerardine Doyle, Zofia Slonska, Barbara Kondilis, Vivian Stoffels, Richard H Osborne, Helmut Brand |
| Abstract |
Several measurement tools have been developed to measure health literacy. The tools vary in their approach and design, but few have focused on comprehensive health literacy in populations. This paper describes the design and development of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q), an innovative, comprehensive tool to measure health literacy in populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Canada | 3 | 21% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Thailand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 804 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Iceland | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 789 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 126 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 11% |
| Researcher | 78 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 5% |
| Other | 171 | 21% |
| Unknown | 249 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 121 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 79 | 10% |
| Psychology | 39 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 111 | 14% |
| Unknown | 277 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,203,636
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,322
of 15,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,414
of 213,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#27
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.