↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from stool samples of children aged 3 to 14 years from Ujjain, India

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from stool samples of children aged 3 to 14 years from Ujjain, India
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pragya Shakya, Peter Barrett, Vishal Diwan, Yogyata Marothi, Harshada Shah, Neeraj Chhari, Ashok J Tamhankar, Ashish Pathak, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is a major global public health concern, particularly in settings where few treatment options are available. Limited research has been done on antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli of Indian children at community level. Therefore we studied antibiotic resistance patterns in E. coli isolates from stool samples of children aged 3-14 years from Ujjain, Central India, to investigate associations of resistance with demographic variables.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 20 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,072,371
of 4,725,882 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,568
of 2,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,096
of 102,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#77
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,725,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.