↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of subpatent Plasmodium falciparum infection: implications for detection of hotspots with imperfect diagnostics

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology of subpatent Plasmodium falciparum infection: implications for detection of hotspots with imperfect diagnostics
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacklin F Mosha, Hugh JW Sturrock, Bryan Greenhouse, Brian Greenwood, Colin J Sutherland, Nahla Gadalla, Sharan Atwal, Chris Drakeley, Gibson Kibiki, Teun Bousema, Daniel Chandramohan, Roly Gosling

Abstract

At the local level, malaria transmission clusters in hotspots, which may be a group of households that experience higher than average exposure to infectious mosquitoes. Active case detection often relying on rapid diagnostic tests for mass screen and treat campaigns has been proposed as a method to detect and treat individuals in hotspots. Data from a cross-sectional survey conducted in north-western Tanzania were used to examine the spatial distribution of Plasmodium falciparum and the relationship between household exposure and parasite density.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 174 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 23%
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 28 15%