↓ Skip to main content

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the ascending stages of the auditory system in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the ascending stages of the auditory system in dogs
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-9-210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan-Peter Bach, Matthias Lüpke, Peter Dziallas, Patrick Wefstaedt, Stefan Uppenkamp, Hermann Seifert, Ingo Nolte

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a technique able to localize neural activity in the brain by detecting associated changes in blood flow. It is an essential tool for studying human functional neuroanatomy including the auditory system. There are only a few studies, however, using fMRI to study canine brain functions. In the current study ten anesthetized dogs were scanned during auditory stimulation. Two functional sequences, each in combination with a suitable stimulation paradigm, were used in each subject. Sequence 1 provided periods of silence during which acoustic stimuli could be presented unmasked by scanner noise (sparse temporal sampling) whereas in sequence 2 the scanner noise was present throughout the entire session (continuous imaging). The results obtained with the two different functional sequences were compared.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 5%
Spain 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Psychology 4 10%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,067,386
of 4,507,509 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#527
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,081
of 101,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#30
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.