↓ Skip to main content

Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5: progress and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5: progress and challenges
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Bryce, Robert E Black, Cesar G Victora

Abstract

The Millennium Development Goals have galvanized efforts to improve child survival (MDG-4) and maternal health (MDG-5). There has been important progress on both MDGs at global level, although it now appears that few countries will reach them by the target date of 2015. There are known and efficacious interventions to address most of the major causes of these deaths, but important gaps remain. The biggest challenge is to ensure that all women and children have access to life-saving interventions. Current levels of intervention coverage are too low, representing missed opportunities. Providing services at the community level is an important emerging priority, but preventing maternal and neonatal deaths also requires access to health facilities. Readers of the Medicine for Global Health collection in BMC Medicine are urged to make maternal and child health one of their key concerns, even if they work on other topics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 177 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,235,983
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,461
of 3,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,805
of 210,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#37
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.