↓ Skip to main content

Physical activity referrals in Swedish primary health care – prescriber and patient characteristics, reasons for prescriptions, and prescribed activities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical activity referrals in Swedish primary health care – prescriber and patient characteristics, reasons for prescriptions, and prescribed activities
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-8-201
Pubmed ID
Authors

ME Leijon, P Bendtsen, P Nilsen, K Ekberg, A Ståhle

Abstract

Over the past decade, practitioners in primary health care (PHC) settings in many countries have issued written prescriptions to patients to promote increased physical activity or exercise. The aim of this study is to describe and analyse a comprehensive physical activity referral (PAR) scheme implemented in a routine PHC setting in Ostergötland County. The study examines characteristics of the PARs recipients and referral practitioners, identifies reasons why practitioners opted to use PARs with their clients, and discusses prescribed activities and prescriptions in relation to PHC registries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 127 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 19%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Sports and Recreations 9 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 35 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,396,976
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,093
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,293
of 89,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.