↓ Skip to main content

Cellular factories for coenzyme Q10 production

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular factories for coenzyme Q10 production
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12934-017-0646-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean Qiu En Lee, Tsu Soo Tan, Makoto Kawamukai, Ee Sin Chen

Abstract

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), a benzoquinone present in most organisms, plays an important role in the electron-transport chain, and its deficiency is associated with various neuropathies and muscular disorders. CoQ10 is the only lipid-soluble antioxidant found in humans, and for this, it is gaining popularity in the cosmetic and healthcare industries. To meet the growing demand for CoQ10, there has been considerable interest in ways to enhance its production, the most effective of which remains microbial fermentation. Previous attempts to increase CoQ10 production to an industrial scale have thus far conformed to the strategies used in typical metabolic engineering endeavors. However, the emergence of new tools in the expanding field of synthetic biology has provided a suite of possibilities that extend beyond the traditional modes of metabolic engineering. In this review, we cover the various strategies currently undertaken to upscale CoQ10 production, and discuss some of the potential novel areas for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 14%
Engineering 7 5%
Chemical Engineering 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 41 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#13,311,299
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#798
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,635
of 310,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.