↓ Skip to main content

Online cognitive behaviour training for the prevention of postnatal depression in at-risk mothers: a randomised controlled trial protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Online cognitive behaviour training for the prevention of postnatal depression in at-risk mothers: a randomised controlled trial protocol
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bethany A Jones, Kathleen M Griffiths, Helen Christensen, David Ellwood, Kylie Bennett, Anthony Bennett

Abstract

Postnatal depression (PND) is the most common disorder of the puerperium with serious consequences for both mother and child if left untreated. While there are effective treatments, there are many barriers for new mothers needing to access them. Prevention strategies may offer a more acceptable means of addressing the problem. Internet interventions can help overcome some barriers to reducing the impact of PND. However, to date there are no published studies that investigate the efficacy of internet interventions for the prevention of PND.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 362 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 15%
Researcher 44 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 63 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 152 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 74 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2013.
All research outputs
#8,331,562
of 14,535,828 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,106
of 3,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,433
of 183,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#222
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,535,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.